




<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.scienticity.net/sw/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Walker: The Wisdom of the Bones - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://www.scienticity.net/sw/index.php?title=Walker:_The_Wisdom_of_the_Bones&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 09:36:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>BNEditor at 01:41, 15 April 2009</title>
			<link>http://www.scienticity.net/sw/index.php?title=Walker:_The_Wisdom_of_the_Bones&amp;diff=2454&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

		&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;
		&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
		&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
		&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
		&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
		&lt;tr valign='top'&gt;
		&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 01:41, 15 April 2009&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 8:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 8:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;That being said, every once in awhile it seems like Walker is indulging in score-settling (when discussing how his views differ from other scientists’ theories). Also, towards the last quarter of the book, the scientific details start coming fast and furious. The tone feels a bit different from the rest of book, and for awhile it was a little jolting. These details dropped it from five checkerboards to four, but it’s still well-worth the read. Recommended!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;That being said, every once in awhile it seems like Walker is indulging in score-settling (when discussing how his views differ from other scientists’ theories). Also, towards the last quarter of the book, the scientific details start coming fast and furious. The tone feels a bit different from the rest of book, and for awhile it was a little jolting. These details dropped it from five checkerboards to four, but it’s still well-worth the read. Recommended!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;-&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Notesby|&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Eva&lt;/del&gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Notesby|&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;EVA&lt;/ins&gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category: Book Notes]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category: Book Notes]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;[[Category: EVA]]&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;!-- diff generator: internal 2026-05-06 09:36:10 --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:41:04 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>BNEditor</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.scienticity.net/wiki/Talk:Walker:_The_Wisdom_of_the_Bones</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BNEditor at 04:22, 9 January 2009</title>
			<link>http://www.scienticity.net/sw/index.php?title=Walker:_The_Wisdom_of_the_Bones&amp;diff=2057&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{BNR-table|scienticity=5|readability=4|hermeneutics=5|charisma=3|recommendation=4}} &lt;br /&gt;
Alan Walker and Pat Shipman, ''The Wisdom of the Bones : In Search of Human Origins''. New York : Knopf : distributed by Random House, 1996. x + 338 pages, 8 pages of plates, illustrated with maps; includes bibliographic references and index. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Walker is a paleo-anthropologist who has spent much of his professional career researching the ancestors of ''Homo sapiens''. This book, written in 1996, is centered around his discovery of an almost-complete skeleton of an adolescent male of ''Homo erectus'' (the species thought to be the &amp;quot;missing link&amp;quot; between humans and our common ancestor with apes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, Walker’s study of the skeleton drives the book. But interwoven with this are chapters covering the history of the search for the missing link and lots of scientific information. There’s a good balance between the science stuff and the personal stuff--Walker’s own experiences digging in eastern Africa, and various character sketches of other scientists on a similar question. And while the book is full of well-told anecdotes and well-explained science, its greatest strength is that it always keeps the big picture in mind: our fundamental need to know who we are. The result is an erudite, compelling account of the scientific attempt to discover our history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That being said, every once in awhile it seems like Walker is indulging in score-settling (when discussing how his views differ from other scientists’ theories). Also, towards the last quarter of the book, the scientific details start coming fast and furious. The tone feels a bit different from the rest of book, and for awhile it was a little jolting. These details dropped it from five checkerboards to four, but it’s still well-worth the read. Recommended!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Notesby|Eva}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Book Notes]]&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:22:42 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>BNEditor</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.scienticity.net/wiki/Talk:Walker:_The_Wisdom_of_the_Bones</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>